Recursos de moho

Considerable advances in science on molds and their potential health effects continue. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Institute of Medicine of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the World Health Organization, and Health Canada all agree that living or working in a building with mold damage results in an increased risk of respiratory disease. There are no accepted national or international standards for mold investigation, evaluation, or remediation, though several guideline documents exist.

AIHA takes advice from such agencies and creates current inspection and sampling protocols, such as Recognition, Evaluation, and Control of Indoor Mold, also known as the "Green Book." These methods are suitable for assessing hidden contamination and directing essential visual inspections. For health outcomes, no exposure assessment methods exist to provide individuals with useful information. This is because each person’s response to mold exposure is unique.

A complex problem

The scientific complexities surrounding this issue are a huge challenge. The truth is that other, less scientific, difficulties dwarf them. Media attention on this topic creates emotionally charged circumstances. This renders scientific and professional judgment and reasoned dialogue challenging. In some instances, building owners often ignore or dismiss potentially serious problems. Many indoor air quality (IAQ) problems are not mold-related. Buildings, however, seldom have only one indoor environmental quality problem. In some instances, occupants or public officials with dubious mold sampling reports react with alarm to potential threats. This makes risk communication difficult.

A well-informed resource for the public

The resources offered below are practical information based on experience by AIHA volunteers. This is not a claim to be a definitive or comprehensive position statement. While not exhaustive, this information is best used in conjunction with other guidance documents and professional judgment by qualified consultants and public health officials.

Public and occupational health practice is rarely an exact science. Prevention is the challenge of making tough and often costly decisions with incomplete information or understanding.